What distinguishes conventional OPFOR tactics from unconventional tactics?

Conventional tactics are characterized by their focus on organized military units that engage in direct combat with structured plans and formations. These tactics are typically employed by regular armies using traditional methods of warfare, involving established military protocols and strategies, as opposed to unconventional tactics, which might include irregular forces employing guerrilla strategies or asymmetric warfare.

In conventional operations, there is a reliance on coordinated attacks and maneuvers among troops, often utilizing a combination of infantry, armor, artillery, and air support in a unified effort to achieve specific military objectives. This approach is iconic of larger, state-sponsored military engagements where battles are fought in more predictable, frontal confrontations.

Unconventional tactics, on the other hand, often rely on surprise, mobility, and indirect engagements, making use of smaller, agile units that operate through irregular means rather than standard combat methods. Thus, the distinction lies predominantly in the structure, organization, and execution of military operations between conventional and unconventional forces.