What term describes an action taken when confronted by a superior enemy with no ability to provide integrated command and control?

The term that best describes an action taken when confronted by a superior enemy, especially in a situation where there is no ability to provide integrated command and control, is a dispersed attack. This approach allows for engagement with the enemy without relying on a centralized command structure, which may be ineffective when facing overwhelming force. By dispersing, units can maintain mobility and flexibility, making it harder for the enemy to target them as a cohesive whole.

In situations where integrated management is lacking, a dispersed attack can be advantageous. Units operate independently or in small groups, targeting specific enemy formations or vulnerabilities, which can disrupt the enemy's cohesion and effectiveness despite their superior strength. This tactic aligns well with a strategic necessity for survival and effective engagement when facing overwhelming odds.

The other options present different strategic contexts. A coordinated defense typically involves a unified command structure working together, and a consolidated attack implies a focused effort, both of which are less viable under the described circumstances. A strategic retreat, while valid in many scenarios, often signals a withdrawal rather than an act of engagement or confrontation, which does not align with the question's focus on immediate tactical responses to an overpowering enemy.