What type of warfare better suits the OPFOR's decentralized command structure?

Guerrilla warfare is characterized by small, mobile, and flexible combat groups that rely on hit-and-run tactics and ambushes to engage a larger, more conventional force. This type of warfare aligns well with a decentralized command structure, as it allows individual units to operate independently and make decisions based on real-time information and circumstances on the ground.

In guerrilla warfare, the emphasis is on adaptability, initiative, and local knowledge, which empowers lower-level leaders to execute tactics without waiting for orders from higher command. This leads to an effective response in dynamic combat conditions, allowing the OPFOR to exploit weaknesses in a more structured and conventional military force.

Other options, such as static defense, generally require a more rigid command and control structure to coordinate defensive positions, making them less suitable for decentralized operations. Naval warfare and air dominance strategies typically involve large-scale operations that depend on strategic planning and coordination, which do not mesh well with the fluidity and independence that guerrilla tactics encourage.