Which approach is typically avoided by OPFOR when conducting unconventional warfare?

Engaging in traditional warfare is typically avoided by OPFOR when conducting unconventional warfare because the primary objective of unconventional warfare is to leverage asymmetrical tactics that capitalize on weaknesses of a more conventionally organized and equipped enemy. Traditional warfare involves direct, large-scale engagements with set battle lines and standard military formations, which plays to the strengths of a conventional military force. In contrast, unconventional warfare relies on guerrilla tactics, surprise, and infiltration to disrupt and confuse the opponent, often avoiding open confrontations that could lead to significant losses.

By steering clear of traditional warfare methods, OPFOR can maximize their effectiveness in unconventional settings, utilizing the environment and employing strategies that favor mobility and surprise rather than strength in numbers or firepower. This approach allows them to maintain an element of unpredictability and adaptability, key advantages in unconventional scenarios.