Which asymmetrical warfare tactic is commonly utilized by OPFOR?

Guerrilla warfare techniques are commonly utilized by OPFOR as they are effective strategies for smaller, less equipped forces to combat larger, conventionally organized military units. These tactics emphasize mobility, surprise, and the element of stealth. Rather than engaging in direct, head-on confrontations that favor larger forces, OPFOR employs hit-and-run attacks, ambushes, and other irregular tactics that take advantage of their knowledge of the terrain and the element of surprise. This approach allows them to disrupt the operations of opponents, erode their morale, and create a constant sense of insecurity, all while often relying on the support of the local population.

In contrast, trench warfare is more traditionally associated with conventional warfare scenarios, particularly in World War I, where both sides dug in to fight over static lines, which does not fit the dynamic nature of asymmetric conflicts. Aerial strikes and naval blockades are typically utilized by more technologically advanced forces and represent conventional military strategies rather than those employed by irregular forces. Thus, guerrilla warfare techniques best exemplify the methods that OPFOR would adopt in an asymmetric context, making it the most suitable choice.